Results-based funding bypasses vulnerable students - AZEdNews
Sections    Friday February 3rd, 2023
Twitter Profile Facebook Profile LinkedIn Profile RSS Profile

Results-based funding bypasses vulnerable students

Nancy Foote, A Science Teacher At Higley’s Sossaman Middle School, Pictured Here Working With Students Was Named Teacher Of The Year By The Queen Creek Chamber Of Commerce. Photo Courtesy Of Carlos Espinosa/Higley Unified School District

The nearly $40 million sought by Arizona Gov. Doug Ducey and approved by the Legislature last spring to reward certain public schools for their academic outcomes began flowing this month. An analysis shows that most schools that received that funding are in Maricopa and Pima counties, serve mainly white students and serve few students with disabilities or who are learning English. A minority of students in the schools that received awards are from low-income families. A disproportionate number of the schools receiving awards are charters.

The governor proposed results-based funding for public schools during his State of the State address in January, and the Arizona Legislature approved Senate Bill 1530 authorizing it in May.  The plan was introduced as a way to expand successful public schools’ reach by providing additional funds for schools whose students scored in the top 10 percent statewide on the 2016 AzMERIT.

Despite a model that provided nearly twice as much money for schools with the most students from low-income families, most of the $38.63 million in results-based funding went to schools with the fewest, according to an analysis of the data by Dr. Anabel Aportela, director of research for Arizona Association of School Business Officials and the Arizona School Boards Association.

Results-based funding bypasses vulnerable students AZEdNewsResultsBasedFunding2017Outcomes-1

Infographic by Lisa Irish/AZEdNews
Click here for a larger version of the infographic

While results-based funding, also known as performance pay, is not new in Arizona, what is new is the attention this plan is attracting from leaders in other states, Aportela said.

“I have a colleague at the Education Commission of the States and his job is to keep up with what’s going on in school finance in every state in the country. He told me he’s getting calls from other states wanting to know more about Arizona’s results-based funding to consider whether they want to implement it in their states,” Aportela said.

Aportela said, “The research is mixed at best” on whether such plans actually improve performance.

Schools with few poor students receive most money

Results-based funding bypasses vulnerable students AwardsByFreeAndReducedLunchChart

Charts courtesy of AASBO and ASBA

Nearly two-thirds of results-based funding went to Arizona public schools with less than 60 percent of students participating in the federal free- and reduced-lunch program, an indicator of poverty.

“What we heard a lot of during the deliberation was that this bill was putting an emphasis on high-poverty schools making gains with students,” Aportela said. “The implication was (that) because we’re giving you $400 per student, we’re valuing that more.”

But the actual distribution of funding showed that was not the case, with 188 schools with less than 60 percent of students in the federal free- and reduced-lunch program receiving $23.77 million, significantly more than the 100 schools with 60 percent or more of students in the federal program received $14.86 million, Aportela said.

“The reason for that is just the high correlation between percent passing – regardless of the test – and poverty,” Aportela said. “This is a correlation that’s universal. It’s a challenge we have across the country, not just in Arizona.”

Plan rewards smaller schools

Results-based funding bypasses vulnerable students AverageSchoolSize

Charts courtesy of AASBO and ASBA

District schools that received results-based funding awards tended to be about one-third the size than those that did not.

“That’s a significant size differential,” Aportela said. “The idea to expand those schools’ reach by doubling them in size might work against the success that the schools have had.”

Rural counties benefit little

Most results-based funding went to schools in the Phoenix and Tucson metropolitan areas, and little went to schools in rural areas.

Maricopa County schools received nearly 64 percent of the awards, Pima County schools earned more than 15 percent and the remaining 21 percent was split between schools in 10 of Arizona’s 15 counties.

Results-based funding bypasses vulnerable students AwardsByCounty

Charts courtesy of AASBO and ASBA

Schools in Greenlee, La Paz and Navajo counties did not receive any results-based funding, while schools in Apache County received just $12,000 in awards, Aportela said.

Student demographics matter

Schools that received results-based funding had more white students and fewer English language learners and students with disabilities.

Schools that received an award also had significantly less Latino students and a low percentage of students who are Native American and African American.

“The state is more than 40 percent Latino, but only about 25 percent Latino in the schools receiving an award,” Aportela said.

Results-based funding bypasses vulnerable students StudentDemographics

Charts courtesy of AASBO and ASBA

How charter schools fared

Charter schools received a disproportionate amount of the results-based funding awards.

“To give you some perspective, districts enroll about 85 percent of Arizona’s students and they’re receiving 70 percent of the results-based funding. Charters have about 15 percent of students and they’re receiving 30 percent of the funding,” Aportela said.

How schools can use awards

While results-based funding is meant to extend the reach of schools whose students score well on AzMERIT, many schools receiving awards are still figuring out how to use the money, said Dr. Chuck Essigs, director of governmental relations for Arizona Association of School Business Officials.

The most common question is how do they – schools – use results-based funding, because the Department of Education has issued some directions to the schools and said be consistent with the law, but everyone I’ve talked to is having a real difficulty in terms of what does that specifically mean,” Essigs said.

Results-based funding bypasses vulnerable students AwardsCharterVsDistrict

Charts courtesy of AASBO and ASBA

Smaller school districts are concerned about how they can replicate the performance that earned them the award.

“If you’re in Alpine, you only have so many people with kids living  in the outlying area,” Essigs said. “You’re not going to be able to replicate that program to get more students. I think it’s certainly a problem for some districts.”

It also depends on what’s the school identifies that has helped it be successful, Aportela said.

“If it’s teacher training for example, certainly you can do more professional development and reach more students,” Aportela said. “If it is having a small school environment, it may be tougher to fund decreasing class sizes.”

Results-based funding bypasses vulnerable students Use-of-Results-based-funding

Charts courtesy of AASBO and ASBA

There should be some flexibility to take things that are working at one school and replicating it at other schools in the district, Essigs said.

The wording of the statute is general enough that if you take the replication option, you can use that money to provide a quality academic experience however your district defines that at other schools,” said Chris Kotterman, director of governmental relations for Arizona School Boards Association. “If one school is doing well and you get extra funding, you can enhance the academic experiences at other schools, thereby improving their quality.”

Another concern is if there is a requirement for the results-based funding to be spent by a certain time.

Results-based funding bypasses vulnerable students Replication-Means

Charts courtesy of AASBO and ASBA

Receiving this money “after the school year started and after a lot of their employment contracts have been established, it would be difficult to expend all of the dollars in the current year,” Essigs said.

The state has let us know that carry-over of funds into the next year will be allowed, Essigs said.